No single LLM dominates every use case in 2025. According to the latest LLM Leaderboard benchmarks, o3-pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro lead in intelligence, but the “best” choice depends on your specific needs:
- For creative writing and coding: Claude 4 Sonnet excels with natural conversation and powerful artifacts
- For research and fact-checking: Perplexity AI leads with real-time web search and source citations
- For general versatility: ChatGPT (GPT-4o) offers the most comprehensive toolkit with memory, image generation, and broad capabilities
- For speed and efficiency: Gemini 2.5 Flash delivers the fastest performance at 372 tokens/second with strong multimodal features
- For real-time information: Grok 3 provides cutting-edge reasoning with current data access
- For maximum context: Llama 4 Scout handles massive 10 million token contexts for document-heavy tasks
Artificial intelligence, LLMs – artistic impression. Image credit: Alius Noreika / AI
The AI market has evolved beyond simple “which is smarter” comparisons. With a few exceptions, Anthropic and OpenAI’s flagship models are essentially at parity, meaning your choice of any particular LLM should focus on specialized features rather than raw intelligence.
The Current State of LLM Competition
The AI assistant wars have intensified dramatically in 2025. The “best” model depends on what you’re trying to do, as each platform has carved out distinct strengths while achieving similar baseline capabilities.
Unlike the early days when capabilities varied wildly between models, today’s leading LLMs have reached remarkable parity in core intelligence tasks. Both Claude and ChatGPT are reliably excellent when dealing with standard queries like text generation, logic and reasoning, and image analysis. This convergence has shifted the competition toward specialized features and user experience.
ChatGPT: The Versatile All-Rounder
Strengths and Capabilities
ChatGPT maintains its position as the most well-rounded LLM-based AI assistant. ChatGPT has one killer feature: Memory, allowing it to remember previous conversations and build relationships with users over time. ChatGPT is the model that just gets you — use it to find your hidden talents and blind spots.
For creative tasks, ChatGPT’s image feature still blows me away regularly. It follows instructions the best and produces the best text rendering. The integration with DALL-E makes it particularly strong for marketing assets and visual content creation.
Performance in Real-World Testing
In one expert test, ChatGPT produced a 36-page report with 25 sources. It included specific recommendations that actually match what Bolt is doing in research tasks, though ChatGPT cut too much copy and lost important details in some editing scenarios.
Best Use Cases
- Creative content generation and brainstorming
- Personalized assistance with memory retention
- Image creation and visual content development
- General-purpose problem solving across domains
Claude: The Thoughtful Communicator
Writing and Coding Excellence
When analyzing coding capabilities, in one test, Claude built a gorgeous game with scores, next-piece preview, and great controls when tested on coding tasks. Claude nailed my conversation style and format in writing tasks, making it particularly strong for editorial work.
Claude is better suited to tasks that are more focused on the craft of writing: it’s great at helping you polish up your own dry prose, and makes a good colleague to bounce ideas off of and get feedback. The platform’s Artifacts feature allows real-time code visualization and iteration.
Ethical Design and Safety
Claude also includes many more ethical guardrails than ChatGPT or Gemini, as part of Anthropic’s mission is to ensure Claude’s output aligns with user values. This focus on safety makes it particularly reliable for professional and educational contexts.
Optimal Applications
- Professional writing and content refinement
- Complex coding projects with visualization needs
- Long-form document analysis and editing
- Ethical and safety-conscious AI interactions
Gemini: The Speed Champion
Performance and Efficiency
Gemini 2.5 Flash (April ’25) (Reasoning) leads in output speed at 372 tokens/second, making it the fastest major model for token generation. In other tests, Gemini was the most consistent performer; it crushed 7 out of 10 prompts, especially anything factual, contextual, or local in comparative testing.
For ultra-low latency applications, Aya Expanse 8B achieves 0.14-second response times, while Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B provides an excellent balance of speed and capability.
Multimodal Capabilities
In the same test, Gemini produced a 48-page report with 100 sources. It was comprehensive but the conclusions were too verbose and felt like corporate gibberish. While thorough, Gemini sometimes provides excessive detail that requires filtering.
Strengths in Specific Domains
- Rapid information processing and synthesis
- Local and contextual query handling
- Large-scale research with extensive source gathering
- Technical and factual query resolution
Perplexity AI: The Research Specialist
Real-Time Information Mastery
Perplexity AI’s real-time search capability gives users the most current information available on the web — literally up to the minute. If you’re looking for a conversational AI chatbot to replace or augment traditional searches, Perplexity AI is hard to beat.
Source Citation and Accuracy
Perplexity AI includes features such as real-time, accurate information with direct citations, which no other search engine provides. Perplexity AI integrates citations by linking specific statements to their original sources, providing detailed and informative references that users can verify.
Professional Research Applications
I often prefer Perplexity AI to ChatGPT when doing research for articles on topics for which new information is coming out quickly. The platform’s Pro Search feature leverages multiple advanced models for enhanced accuracy.
Prime Use Cases
- Academic and professional research
- Fact-checking and source verification
- Real-time market analysis and trends
- Technical documentation and current events
Grok: The Contrarian Thinker
Unique Positioning
Grok (developed by Elon Musk’s xAI) distinguishes itself with a “truth-seeking” design and an edgier personality. Grok 3 Beta, the latest advanced reasoning model from xAI, excels in complex math, science and coding tasks.
The platform emphasizes real-time information access and alternative perspectives, though it’s still developing its feature set compared to more established competitors.
Applications
- Complex mathematical and scientific problem solving
- Alternative perspective generation
- Real-time reasoning tasks
- Contrarian analysis and debate preparation
Technical Performance Metrics
Intelligence and Quality Rankings
According to the latest LLM Leaderboard benchmarks, o3-pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro represent the highest quality models available, followed by o3 and o4-mini (high). This represents a significant shift in the intelligence hierarchy, with Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro achieving parity with OpenAI’s most advanced reasoning models.
However, all up-to-date LLMs achieve similar performance on standard benchmarks, meaning practical differences often come down to specialized features rather than raw intelligence.
Speed and Efficiency
The speed landscape shows dramatic improvements across the board. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B leads with 387 tokens/second, though this smaller model trades some capability for speed. Among full-featured models, Gemini 2.5 Flash (April ’25) (Reasoning) achieves 372 tokens/second, making it the fastest major reasoning model.
For latency-critical applications, Aya Expanse 8B (0.14s) and Command-R (0.15s) offer the lowest response times, followed by LFM 40B and Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B.
Cost Considerations
The pricing landscape remains highly competitive. Gemma 3 4B ($0.03) and Ministral 3B ($0.04) lead as the most cost-effective options, followed by DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Llama 3.2 3B. These ultra-low-cost models make AI accessible for high-volume applications.
For consumer interfaces, most leading platforms offer similar pricing around $20/month for premium features, though API pricing varies significantly based on model choice and usage patterns.
Making the Right Choice for Your Needs
For Content Creators and Writers
Claude is best for users focused on sophisticated text and code work. Its more natural writing style, powerful coding capabilities with real-time visualization through Artifacts, and thoughtful analytical approach make it the superior choice for developers, writers, and analysts who need depth over breadth.
For Researchers and Analysts
Perplexity AI excels in core features and accuracy with its citation-based approach and real-time web access making it ideal for research-heavy workflows.
For General Users and Teams
ChatGPT is best for users who want an all-in-one AI toolkit. Its image generation capabilities and custom GPT marketplace make it ideal for users who want to explore the full spectrum of what AI can do.
For Speed-Critical Applications
Gemini’s dominance in speed metrics makes it ideal for high-volume, time-sensitive tasks. Gemini 2.5 Flash (April ’25) (Reasoning) at 372 tokens/second provides enterprise-grade performance without sacrificing reasoning capabilities, while ultra-fast models like DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B at 387 tokens/second serve applications where raw speed trumps sophistication.
For Document-Heavy Workflows
The emergence of ultra-large context windows creates new possibilities. Llama 4 Scout’s 10 million token capacity can process entire technical manuals, legal case files, or software repositories as single inputs, eliminating the traditional need for document chunking strategies.
The Multi-Tool Approach
If you’re a heavy AI user, you may want access to both tools—especially because you’re likely to run up against rate limits. Many professionals now maintain subscriptions to multiple platforms, using each for its specialized strengths.
And if you want both? No shame in using different tools for different purposes. The total cost of 2-3 specialized subscriptions often provides better value than trying to force one tool to handle all use cases.
Looking Ahead: The Evolving Landscape
The future points toward increased specialization rather than convergence. As models achieve similar baseline intelligence, differentiation will come through specialized features, integration capabilities, and user experience innovations.
The question isn’t “which LLM is best?” but rather “which combination of tools best serves your specific workflow?” Success in 2025 comes from matching the right tool to the right task, not from finding one perfect solution for everything.
- AI in Law Enforcement: Enhancing Digital Evidence Management
- How to prepare data for machine learning and prevent model overfitting?
- Understanding Multimodal AI
Sources: LLM Leaderboard, Zapier, CreatorEconomy, Type.ai blog, Techpoint Africa, eWeek, Perplexity, RedBlink, FastBots
Written by Alius Noreika
