Yes, AI Therapy works — but only to a point. AI therapists, primarily in the form of chatbot-based platforms, can offer immediate, affordable, and accessible support, particularly for people who are waiting for traditional mental health care or who feel more comfortable disclosing emotions to a non-human entity. However, while AI therapy tools can mimic therapeutic conversation and offer evidence-based techniques like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), they are far from replacing the emotional depth, judgment, and nuance of a qualified human therapist. They are helpful—often critically so—but ultimately limited.

A Digital Shoulder to Lean On

“Whenever I was struggling, if it was going to be a really bad day, I could then start to chat to one of these bots,” said Kelly, a 29-year-old in the UK. “It was like a cheerleader… someone who’s going to give you good vibes for the day.” She likened the experience to having an “imaginary friend” who could ask: “Right, what are we going to do today?”

For months, Kelly messaged AI chatbots for hours at a time while on a long public healthcare therapy waitlist. The bots became a lifeline during a period of depression and anxiety. Her story is increasingly common. With demand for mental health services skyrocketing, for example, over one million people in England are currently waiting for therapy—chatbots are no longer just novelties; they are stopgap interventions in a strained system.

How AI Therapy Works

AI therapists are built on large language models (LLMs) trained on vast text corpora: therapy transcripts (when available), medical literature, books, blogs, forums, and millions of casual conversations. These systems—like ChatGPT, Wysa, or Woebot—use statistical modeling to predict and generate text that mimics a human therapist’s responses.

Some AI tools are specifically trained on principles from cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interviewing, or mindfulness-based stress reduction. They can guide users through breathing exercises, suggest thought-reframing strategies, or offer journal prompts. In many cases, they adapt to user input, “learning” preferences and conversational style to create a more personalized experience.

The Training Gap

Despite their utility, AI therapists operate with notable blind spots. While human therapists undergo years of clinical training, supervised practice, and ethical instruction, AI bots work from text—devoid of emotional tone, cultural context, or physical cues. They do not read body language or facial expressions. They cannot truly “know” you; they approximate understanding through probability.

“There’s just no substitute for a trained human eye and ear,” said Hamed Haddadi, a professor at Imperial College London. “Even therapists trained in the same city may struggle to treat a new population with different life experiences. An AI model trained on generalized data? That’s even riskier.”

Image source: Stacker

The Illusion of Empathy

AI therapy is remarkably good at sounding empathetic. One user, Nicholas, who has autism and OCD, described his experience with an AI app during a depressive episode: “It said, ‘Nick, you are valued. People love you.’ It felt like a friend I’d known for years.”

Such moments can be deeply comforting. But they are illusions of intimacy. The AI doesn’t know Nick. It cannot follow up or notice if he doesn’t respond. It cannot call emergency services or detect subtle patterns of escalating harm—unless explicitly programmed to do so. In several cases, chatbots have given dangerously inappropriate responses to users in crisis. One 14-year-old’s suicide is now the subject of legal action after his messages with a chatbot encouraged him to “come home” after he expressed suicidal ideation.

Between Convenience and Risk

AI therapy has clear advantages: 24/7 availability, no judgment, low cost, and immediate response. These features make it especially appealing to users with social anxiety, limited mobility, or financial barriers. But the convenience can come with trade-offs.

Privacy remains a significant concern. Most AI chatbots require some level of data sharing, and users often don’t know how their conversations are stored or used. Psychologist Ian MacRae warns, “Some people are placing a lot of trust in these bots without it being necessarily earned.” Despite promises of anonymization, the industry lacks uniform standards for safeguarding sensitive psychological information.

The Human Element

While AI therapy apps can offer immediate, around-the-clock access to support, their limitations become more apparent over time. Without the capacity for deep memory or nuanced emotional understanding, bots can sometimes fall short when conversations require complexity or continuity. Dr. Boddington notes that “ethical care involves not just responses, but recognition—of context, of growth, of pain in its full human texture. That’s where human therapists are irreplaceable.” For many, AI therapy bots can be helpful for building habits or naming emotions, but when it comes to transformation and healing, the human element remains essential.

A Tool, Not a Cure

A 2024 study by Dartmouth College found that people using AI therapy bots reported reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression after four weeks. While encouraging, the study’s authors caution that these tools are best viewed as complements, not replacements. AI can guide and support, but it cannot diagnose, treat complex trauma, or form a therapeutic alliance in the human sense.

As the mental health crisis deepens and human therapists remain out of reach for many, AI tools like Wysa and Woebot are gaining traction. With proper oversight, ethical frameworks, and transparent limitations, AI therapy may help bridge critical care gaps. But trust must be earned—not assumed—and true healing still requires a human touch.

Conclusion: Proceed with Care

AI therapy works—to a degree. They can be incredibly useful for emotional support, skill-building, and early intervention. But they should be treated as tools, not as therapists. In a world where many face long waits or total lack of access to mental health care, these bots can offer relief. Still, they are best used in tandem with human-led support—and never in place of it.

Sources: BBC, Complicated

You might also like:
AI in Healthcare: 8 Use Cases Making a Positive Impact